UrbanWorkbench

Education and Healthcare in the Kootenays

by Mike Thomas on March 1, 2010

in Sustainability

You know the situation in the Province is not looking good when the stories that grace the local newspapers are about service and funding cuts in Health and Education. This time it’s Selkirk College and the Kootenay Boundary Regional Hospital in Trail, and that’s not even touching on the issues facing the local School District (SD 20). For Selkirk College, their future rests on providing regionally contextual courses that can tie into other local activities and needs, healthcare and forestry being two obvious ones, aviation being another – but funding for this regional college is tight, forcing administration to choose between staff, students and facilities, it looks like the students won out, but it is a short term victory without ongoing maintenance of the facilities.

At Selkirk, the allowance for upgrades and maintenance to facilities is expected to be slashed by 74 per cent, reducing it from $1.4 million to $368,000. “There are many routine things, like putting fresh paint on the wall, that just won’t happen this year,” explained Selkirk College president Marilyn Luscombe. The college is working internally to put aside contingency funds to use for emergency maintenance that may be needed through the year, though it hasn’t disclosed where that money will come from.

Selkirk budgets for cuts and for the latest (in a long line of issues) facing healthcare in the Kootenays, now it is operating capacity that is being cut…

“The standard of care in this region cannot afford any more cuts. There are significant costs associated with longer wait times for surgery. More people waiting longer for procedures will further burden an already overwhelmed system,” said Mungall. Conroy and Mungall are asking that the Minister meet with the hospital’s surgical team to listen and work with them to make sure that health care in the Kootenay – Boundary region is protected.

Boundary Sentinel: KBRH OP/ED All levels of government are torn between the priorities of those who lobby them. The two-faced PR campaign that we’ve seen over the past year, claiming economic stimulus on one hand, while making cuts from other areas of society, is something we’ve grown accustomed to, and during times of economic turmoil, (and make no doubt about it folks, we have not reached the other side of the river yet on that one!), the pull of money away from long term benefiting projects to ones of seeming immediate need will continue.

“Few of the [stimulus] projects are transformative,” said Joseph Schofer, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Northwestern University.

CityScapes – Chicago Tribune We should be aiming to position society into a clean energy descent, equipped with simplified systems and increased resilience in the vital areas of health, education, and civic infrastructure. Some of what we value now will show itself to be less than valuable in the cold hard light of a future with less carbon based fuel consumption.

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Castlegar Springs

by Mike Thomas on February 25, 2010

in Castlegar, Community, Regulation

The Grade-A services we enjoy in Castlegar from the library, water, sewer, streets and sidewalks, right through to the snow clearing operation comes with a hefty price tag. There is an indication out there that we are about to find this out, either through reduced services or increased taxes, as council balances a shift of taxes away from the industrial tax base, predominantly funded by the Celgar pulp mill.

We are not in too different a situation from the city of Colorado Springs, in which they found that municipal revenues were down some 28.9 million dollars or 8% from the 2009 budget. (Admittedly the tax structure is very different, as are the state laws on how much say taxpayers get in raising taxes, but the lack of revenue is similar).

In Colorado Springs, every third streetlight is dark. Buses no longer run at night or on weekends. City pools will soon be dry, trash bins have disappeared and the verdant grass in the city’s famed parks will soon grow long, turn brown and die.

The city no longer offers basic services that people expect from their local government

Read more: National Post – Budget crisis sees Colorado Springs go dark

Culbreth-Graft’s proposed $209.9 million general-fund budget, down 8 percent from the revised 2009 operating budget, will be formally presented to the City Council next week.

“The City Council will have a task that I have never seen a council have to deal with in my 32 years of experience that will (involve) some of the most egregious and horrific cuts that this city has ever had to experience,” a somber-looking Culbreth-Graft said.

“While the council has grappled with extremely difficult issues for the last two fiscal years, this one will be unparalleled to the pain and the agony in which they had to experience in the previous years,” she said.

Read more: The Gazette – City Unveiling 2010 Budget

As you can imagine, not everyone is thrilled with the situation, and some members of the business community have taken to forming a group to audit the City’s plans, they are called, “The City Committee”:

The problem is not confined to Colorado Springs – cities all across the United States are struggling, said Chuck Fowler, a committee member.

“Atlas is shrugging,” Mr. Fowler said.

“We have to manage our limited resources better. We’re looking to run a good, clean, efficient government. Nobody has a political agenda here. We’re really just trying to operate our city government within its diminishing means.”

Read more: National Post – Budget crisis sees Colorado Springs go dark

In Castlegar, we don’t have helicopters to sell or a police force we can cut, but we can be more restrained in how we develop infrastructure such as the plans to service the airport lands and the proposed gaming centre.

Castlegar Council recently met with members of the Chamber of Commerce to discuss taxation strategies and identify potential issues with the situation they are facing. Unfortunately, the invitation to attend the meeting came too late for me to attend, and was not from the City in any case, rather it was through a member of the Chamber – as far as I can tell, it was not announced publicly. Kyra at the Castlegar Source has done a write up of the meeting, which is posted here.

The City still hasn’t announced it’s schedule for public meetings or bylaw considerations for the financial plan, my guess is that they are waiting to see what the supreme court says about the Celgar issue, from this article on the Castlegar Source, it sounds like the Mayor is optomistic…

Chernoff said he expects the city’s position to be similarly vindicated in court [as for the other municipalities in similar cases], but the basics of the situation remain the same, by his lights.

“We still need to work with Celgar to make sure our largest employer is viable and healthy,” he said. “But we also need to see that (tax) bill paid.”

This goes to court on the 22nd and 23rd of March 2010, so I guess we’ll wait and see which way the budget will go. In the meantime, the question of core services and levels of service needs to be addressed. The infrastructure bill is rising, (and that’s just for what the City already has), there are legislated upgrades required to the water system, and the other levels of government are not flush with cash. Municipalities across North America are realizing as their industry or business tax revenue declines, that they are having to do more with less. Whatever the outcome from the court case, it is likely that the City will offer a reduction in taxes to Celgar, this slack is either picked up by residents as taxes, or in reduced services. Which will it be?

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Shape Vancouver is a visioning survey project looking at the future of the City in 2050. The video on the front page of ShapeVancouver.com suggests that by increasing the City’s density there would be “significant environmental benefits” The About page has this to say…

Shape Vancouver is an online poll for citizens of Vancouver and beyond to have their say on the future shaping of Vancouver’s downtown peninsula. What will your city look like? Pay attention to the ‘graphic equalizer’ at the bottom of the screen, and see how your manipulation of the City’s skyline affects Carbon Savings, Energy Consumption, Infrastructure Costs and Automobile Usage.

This is exactly the message that has been promoted by Smart Growth enthusiasts across North America, believing that the act of creating more compact Cities will immediately move the population into a quasi-European power-down mode.

However, a recent article on Planetizen from Dr. Tony Recsei suggests that these claimed facts may not have empirical support…

Advocates of high-density policies (often termed “Smart Growth” but also under other descriptions and euphemisms such as “urban consolidation”, “compact development”, “growth management” and “urban renewal”) maintain these policies save energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

A comprehensive study of per capita emissions in Australia based on household consumption of all products and services appears in the Australian Conservation Foundation’s Consumption Atlas. Unexpectedly, this analysis shows that greenhouse gas emissions of those living in high-density areas are greater than for those living in low-density areas.

Source: Planetizen – Resisting Dickensian Gloom

I think we need to be careful supporting policies that claim to be green, just because they claim to be green. Urban high density patterns have been held high by progressive urban planners as the form of settlement that we should all aspire to living in, and that those who choose the suburbs, or heaven forbid, a rural community(gasp!), might somehow be inferior to those who chose to live downtown in a 40 storey condo building.

The urban/rural divide is always growing, we see it with the spending on the Olympics, on education, on transportation options and on grant funding, the justification for Vancouver to grow should not necessarily be based on environmental or sustainability metrics, but rather the fact that a lot of people do want to vive there and a tighter pattern of settlement permits greater numbers to enjoy the same amenities.

I sense this is a case of good intentions that may possibly backfire, from a revision of the data and understanding of the environmental costs and benefits of higher density forms of settlement.

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Well sort of…

If you’ve never seen Street View, click on this link to Google Maps, and notice at the top of the zoom scale on the left a little orange man. Click and drag this man onto the map, as you move the man onto the view, the roads with street view are highlighted in blue. “Drop” the man onto the street you wish to view and the screen will refresh with a view from the street level. Now you can pan, zoom, “drive” down the street, and view linked photos from users.

The Street View is only available on the Highways throughout the West Kootenays, but in larger centres such as Kelowna, Spokane, WA and Cranbrook, (as well as all the big cities), all streets have been photographed and input into the software.

One immediate use for the Street View in this region is giving friends and relatives that are visiting directions for where to turn off the highway, take a screenshot, mark it up, send them a link to Google Maps. Simple.

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Castlegar’s Property Maintenance Bylaw

by Mike Thomas on February 18, 2010

in Sustainability

Castlegar City Council mis close to adopting a new property maintenance bylaw, which will require owners to keep theiir propoerty free from noxious weeds, insect infestations and rubbish. Additionally, sidewalks will become the property owner’s responsibility to keep clear of snow, dust and debris; and boulevards in general must be kept in a safe and tidy condition, including mowing grass and trimming trees and shrubs.

The Castlegar News quotes Councillor Chernoff as stating that the City will help clear sidewalks, which I don’t see written anywhere in the bylaw…

Coun. Kevin Chernoff explained expenses for small upkeep projects around town have to be kept under control. While the city will continue to help clear sidewalks around town, residents will be expected to take the responsibility.

Castlegar News – Sidewalk responsibility to fall on residents

A bylaw like this relies heavily on the individual property owners taking responsibility for the items delegated, for instance, despite strict time requirements for clearing snow, ice or other dangerous conditions on the sidewalk, the remedy for the City rests on a double registered letter and remediation from property owners within fourteen days! However, the alternative, as is practiced in Cities like Calgary, is for the City to send crews out and charge the property owner for the labour – something I can’t imagine our friendly Council supporting. But will people put the effort in if the expectation is that the City will look after it, or you’ve got two weeks to fix it up?

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Post 900

by Mike Thomas on February 18, 2010

in Sustainability

Back in August of 2006, I decided to start up my fourth experiment in blogging, a professional blog about issues surround Sustainability, Land Development, Engineering and the local economy and urban form. The first three blog experiments have been long abandoned now, but UrbanWorkbench is still going strong, and with this post we’ve hit 900!

According to the computational search engine, Wolfram|Alpha, it has been 1288 days, or 920 weekdays since we started. Does that mean I’ve only taken 20 days off writing? Typically I write more than one post in a session, and do a lot of it on weekends, shuffling posts around as breaking news takes precedence.

Wolfram|Alpha

So this is the point where I thank everyone who has supported me in this endeavor, particularly my wife Robyn, who has been extremely patient, the sponsors who have provided advertising support, t-shirts, coffee mugs, conference passes, academic books, non-fiction books to review, and speaking and writing opportunities. Lastly I’d really like to thank those who have participated in the conversations going on here, particularly those of you in the Kootenays who are affected by some of the local issues I’ve covered since moving here.

We moved to the Kootenays just over 3 years ago, when I started this blog we had no idea where we would end up living, only that we were planning on moving back to Canada. Now we are here, we couldn’t imagine loving anywhere else as much.

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 3 comments }

We speak in very real terms about the state of infrastructure deficit we find ourselves in as a nation and as municipalities, and scratch our heads as we wonder how we are going to possibly find the money to complete all of the upgrades or renewal required. Charles Hughes Smith, the author of Survival+: Structuring Prosperity for Yourself and the Nation, a book currently sitting in my “to read” pile here at home points out that the financial solution to this problem probably isn’t as hard to spot as we choose to believe…

Maintaining or improving the infrastructure of the U.S. requires a mere slice of the GDP. Maintaining or improving sewage, water, rail/transport electrical and Internet systems requires very little money compared to the trillions squandered on Empire, bailing out various Financial/Power Elites and the 70% of the GDP squandered on “consumerist paradise.”Were priorities to be re-ordered, a Third World GDP would be more than adequate to fund a functioning, efficient infrastructure. The money wasted on Empire and sickcare alone could rebuild the entire nation’s critical infrastructure.

Of Two Minds – Why I am Optomistic

This idea is only a small part of the essay Charles writes in the above link, but my questions to the readers are:

How realistic is this vision of a western society dropping all the pretense of utopia, and getting back to focusing on the reality of providing necessities for healthy, functioning communities?

Can we start having discussions about adequate services that can be provided at a sustainable cost, rather than premium services at premium costs?

Would society, in time, find ways to fill in the gaps that have been left by diminished government budgets?

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

It’s all in the numbers. On reading about the Green Municipal Funding for the Cogeneration System at the Regional District of Nanaimo Wastewater Treatment Facility, you’d imagine that the system was making a huge dent in the electricity required to power Vancouver Island.

Cogeneration at [Wastewater Treatment Facility] will significantly offset electricity demands on Vancouver Island, prolonging the life of the aging submarine transmission cables that bring electricity to the island. This will also allow BC Hydro to provide service to additional users without adding capacity to the electrical grid, giving the utility more time to investigate new sustainable power options.

“Thanks to the help of the FCM, cogeneration at our facility will benefit electricity users throughout the Vancouver Island region, and strenghten our efforts for energy sustainability here in the RDN,” said RDN Board Chair Joe Stanhope. “Once our system is operational it may encourage other wastewater treatment plants in BC to pursue similar projects.”

Source: CivicInfo – Green Municipal Fund Supports Cogeneration System for Regional District of Nanaimo Wastewater Treatment Facility (emphasis mine).

I’ve found that most of this sort of talk is found in grant applications, for it is in these documents that the hyperbole of benefits is most apparent. Elsewhere in the article, it is understated that the power will simply offset some of the power requirements of the plant itself, but for the moment, lets focus on the claim that “Cogeneration at GNPCC will significantly offset electricity demands on Vancouver Island”. Read more about the BioGas…

  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Instapaper
  • Google Gmail
  • Google Reader
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • Blogger Post
  • Hotmail
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • WordPress
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }