While listening to this podcast, I was struck by how similar the discussion sounded to what I had experienced while living in Castlegar, a town of around 7,500 in rural BC.
The Pending Financial Implosion of Small Town America – StrongTowns Podcast. (link to site here).
Strongtowns is a blog and podcast that has packaged a couple of core themes together in the hopes that the discussion on the web and in communities will move towards a greater understanding of the flaws in the current models of community planning and development, and some of the answers to our predicaments of infrastructure deficit and obese streetscapes.
What struck me was the absurdity of a small town (Castlegar) with four separate commercial zones (three existing, and one proposed at the airport), each effectively taking something from the others. There is little to blame for this but poor land use planning that led to the zoning of lands outside the downtown core for retail and commercial purposes, which led to a cascading disinvestment in the downtown. The latest such venture is the airport lands, held up as, “the only flat commercial land left in the Kootenays”. But for a community that wqas so interested in sustainability over the past couple of years, the decision to invest in development of utilities to these lands represents a huge departure froma plan for a walkable, compact community, and instead dilutes the density of commercial space. In Castlegar, the only recent example of a major retail business moving closer to downtown was Lordco, an automotive parts retailer, who located their new building in the new and used car core of Castlegar.Fundamental to what Strongtowns sees as the challenges to the financial sustainability of small towns, (and yes Castlegar is a small town folks), are the following practices.
- Developing the outskirts while investment in the core declines
- streetscapes that reflect auto-centric madness
- parking lagoons and single storey developments
All of these are issues that Castlegar faces, and were brought up during the community input to the OCP process, yet the Airport Lands remains a priority of the current Mayor and Council.
As the City of Castlegar pushes forward with extensions to the water and sewer utilities to the proposed development of the Castlegar airport lands, several questions are raised in my mind:
- what is the existing commercial floor area to population ratio in the City of Castlegar, even treating the commercial district as a regional one.
- what is the expected tax revenue for the development when fully built out vs the cost to service.
- what is the expected funding to the water and sewer utilities vs cost to maintain and replace assets in the lifespan.
- has the City determined the cost of maintaining and operating the water, sewer, streetlights and snowplowing for the proposed development, will this cost be covered by taxes and user fees raised?
- has the City determined the lifecycle cost of the assets gained through the development and provided a clear roadmap for funding these liabilities?
- has the City conducted a market study to determine what businesses may choose to locate in this development and which existing businesses may be impacted by the change in competition?